The Real Reason Behind The switch from Analog to Digital

The age of deception is here and thanks to digital technology is now even easier to fool people in mass numbers. Seeing & hearing is no longer worth believing when it comes to digital technology. A photograph, a video, and a any sound can be digitally manipulated to show something that is not really there. This lead us to the topic of why the US will be switching all broadcasts from analog to digital.

The answer is a two part answer; first, the most obvious reason is because with digital broadcasting, it would be incredibly easy to manipulate a live image. So what does that mean, you may ask?

That means that they can show you for instance a “terrorist act” taking place that really never took place and then use the images as proof of why we must retaliate and go to war with a particular nation. This is very dangerous stuff.

See Simon Shacks TV Fakery On 911 - They Did It Back In 2001!


Another reason why the switch from analog to digital is taking place, is a more malignant reason, and as reason # 1, most people are not aware of it and they should. Undisclosed sources, experts on reverse technology have informed that any television set manufacture after 1995 has the capability not only to receive a broadcast signal, but to also send one. That’s correct, any television manufactured after 1995 already has a built in feature to send a broadcast signal from your living room of live images of what’s happening in your home.

You may ask, how can this be possible?


Its really not as far fetched as you may think, experts say that anything that is built for one particular purpose, can in deed be reconfigured to perform the exact opposite. For instance, a car is built to drive forward but it can also go backwards, a blowing machine used to blow leaves can actually be reconfigure to do a sucking function. I believe we call those “vacuum cleaners”

OK, but how could they pull off such operation of such magnitude? (You may ask)

* Well, they did this on stages, first stage was to begin manufacturing these TV sets with hidden cameras either behind the picture tube or on the remote sensor area.

* Next, they would need to change the communication wiring network system to make it possible to receive multiple signals from multiple locations.

Well, you might remember that that’s been accomplished too. The system is called fiber optics and it’s been wired everywhere, phone lines and broadcasting lines in which are joined in one gigantic digital communication network.

Now, since they know that they won’t be able to spy and monitor people through an older television set model, their solution is ingenious.

You simply won’t be able to watch any television programming until you either, buy a newer set which already comes equipped to monitor you, or until you buy their TV box converters in which will come equipped with the same technology implanted on the newer TV models that will facilitate their monitoring of you by watching you in your own home!

Can’t afford a digital converter box?

Don’t worry, the govertment has millions of coupons that will assist you in getting one!

In other words, they want to be able to monitor every single one of us through hidden cameras in which will be installed on these devices to see and hear all that you do in the privacy of your own home.

This is called “New World Order”. In communist countries like Cuba, if you say something that the government doesn’t like, a secret police will report you to the higher authorities and you will be whisked away and no one will see or hear from you again. Why aren’t they doing that now?


Well, the fact is that the carpet is being laid folks, and they will do just that in due time. The US constitution would have to be totally destroyed and some of you might already know that is already being accomplished. With the help of the media in which the NWO owns, people’s minds are being reshaped, controlled, and manipulated, in what they see, hear, or should believe is right, wrong, true, or false.

This is a fascist state known as the New world order, where your privacy, rights, and privileges will be gone like a thief in the night.

Its so outrageous that they see you (the average citizen) as one dumb sheep. If they tell you is good, then you better believe it. Comcast has jumped in the ban wagon assisting the NWO by openly admitting that they are installing cameras on their new Comcast cable boxes. They claim that this is to “serve you better” of course. You see, because once you approach your television set, your TV will recognize you and pull all of your favorite TV programming ready for your viewing pleasure.

Come on!

Who writes the scripts for these people, and why do they insist we we are as dumb as a door knob? The fact is that be ready to be insulted, demoralized, ridiculed, and who knows what more, because you are a thinking person and have common sense.

The NWO, don’t like that one bit, so they will do their best to discredit the sources that produce truth. Folks, this is happening every day.

Any one with a legitimate question is being ridiculed, any one bringing legitimate concerns, its being labeled a “quack” a “nut” a “conspiracy fool” etc, etc.

Be ready, be prepare, be advised, because God does not allow anything to happen unless the people are informed and aware of what’s coming, but if you reject the truth, you are condemning yourself and you will be deceived.

And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 (King James Version)


Source

Read more!

TV Media - They Would Never Lie To Us Right?

Think again!




THIS WAS NOT A BAD COMEDY SHOW , THIS WAS CNN 17 YEARS AGO

Google Charles Jaco!

Now, the typical idiotic denial reaction applied on this: "This isn't fake! Why would they fake it? Wouldn't be easier to make real news on real places instead of faking them?"

Watch the complete versions here and here


Or watch below













The background was actually the wall from the Dhahran International Hotel. They built a wooden studio around it and illuminated everything, giving it this fake background look. It was like their own daily TV Show set with all the commodities needed.

"the Dhahran International Hotel served as our base from August of 1990 to June of 1991. Overnight this self proclaimed Businessmans hotel sitting off a runway at the Dhahran International Airport became the information brain center for the international media, governments, and military in the first Gulf War" see here

The MSM, the governments and the military having a common brain center? Does this means the MSM was part of the team?


And don't forget that the first Gulf War (1991) was "the event that put CNN indelibly on the map, not only in the U.S. but around the world


So it seams that audiences was one of the main goals along with fear and warmongering. So why not simply stage exaggerated news? After all, people love "reality" shows, don't they?


Still not convinced?
Then pay attention to:

At Minute 2:14 you can hear someone from the backstage whispering "...he's so convincing..." and then someone else laughing.

At Minute 4:19 you can see why you can hear them.


(The crew had mics and were laughing when Charles was acting like he smelled something. It was all a big joke to them)

Read more!

Luc Courchesne's 3 Very Different Planes (Videos) - I smell Fakery.

Luc Courchesne shots - 3 very different video clips.

Same angle

With and without Audio





Luc Courchesne's Missing Video







Please see Henster37 showing both videos at the same time with his thoughts

I saved Clip 1 last year, since then I haven't been able to find it again.

Clip 1 shows what appears to be a missile not a plane , however Clips 2 + 3 show a plane.

Anyone who has seen Simon Shacks "September Clues" yearns for the day when someone is brave enough to come forward with the video showing a missile(s) hitting the WTC.

Could Clip 1 in this video show the missile hitting the WTC? was Clip 2 + 3 uploaded and spread in order to cover up this little mistake?

Or are they all fakes?


I can't find Clip 1 anywhere on youtube if you find it please let me know!

Read more!

911 Enlighting The Shadows

A video showing PROOF there was no plane that hit the WTC, just look at this persons research!!!


Simon Shack was right! Please visit his channel to see more footage of the TV Fakery



Or visit Fight Tyranny (our) Channel to see more in the "favorite's" section.

Read more!

Proof No Planes Hit The WTC On 911 - September Clues - TV Fakery

9/11- The Missile That Destroyed The WTC - September Clues.


Today I stumbled upon an amazing documentary made by Social Service

Firstly I want to say a big thank you to Simon Shack. Without Your hours of painstaking research and time we would all still be in the dark.



This article will delve into eyewitness accounts, video/Audio analysis, Pentagon, authentic video showing a missile flying into the WTC. & So much more.

After watching the videos below, You will begin to see how much of the truth was kept from us.


Fox, NBC, CNN, have all been lying to us about the events of 9/11 , even down to forging their footage of the so called 747's flying into both buildings of the World Trade Center.

Let's take into consideration for just a moment, that what hit the WTC was not a plane, but indeed a missile.


We shall start with the fact that September 11 LIVE coverage was NOT live.






CNN FAKE HIT COMPARISONS






CNN FAKE FOOTAGE







Think TV Fakery is a joke? This is not a bad comedy this was CNN 17 years ago!......Google Charles Jaco!







Watch The FULL version here or below.











So let's get started ....to keep you interested (as if you wouldn't be already!) see some screenshots from this youtube movie below (The actual video to watch is below the screenshots)



Devin Clarks infamous video capture from the 24th floor of his office building.




But hang on CNNs shot is also Identical to Devin Clarks shot





And if we Overlap them......






But thats normal right, CNN paid Devin Clark for the footage, its all legit you have no idea what you are talking about.

Well consider this.










Woah A building on wheels! dude thats incredible!? or ...... "Digital Imagery?









Still not convinced?


Watch 911 Amateur Part 1 right now






911 Amateur Part 2






911 Amateur Part 3








Lets move onto the Missile



Loose Change reports here in this short clip video (Which I cannot Embed..grrrrr) That there is a flash before the "Plane" hits the tower. however could the plane as seen in that video, be just digitally inserted , and the flash was from the missile?

this leaves us asking this question " who was so idiotic not to synchronize the impact explosion of the missile at the same time as the (digitally inserted) plane hitting the tower? my guess was they were sloppy and didn't think us little people would pick up on it.




September Clues



Well lets see what information the following documentary will show us.

It is in 8 parts and I suggest if you have been reading this far you watch them

But hang on Did someone say Manhattan has a MOBILE BRIDGE!?

Part 5 of the videos below show this bridge moving yet the background stays still ... Amaaaazing *jumps up and down*

Keep your eye on the bottom left hand corner in each frame, see the top of the building there? See the bridge moving ever nearer to it?

























Still don't get it? then mosey on down to Part 5 of the documentary and it shall all become clear, it's ok you can watch it from this page if you feel lazy ;)



Watch September Clues in 9 parts here

Part 1

SEPTEMBER CLUES part1

Part 2

SEPTEMBER CLUES part2

Part 3

SEPTEMBER CLUES part3

Part 4

SEPTEMBER CLUES part4

Part 5

SEPTEMBER CLUES part5

Part 6

SEPTEMBER CLUES part6

Part 7

SEPTEMBER CLUES part7

Part 8

SEPTEMBER CLUES part8

Part 9




September Clues Epilogue








The Passengers (this question can be answered in one of the videos above)

So you ask "what about the passengers and families of those killed in the hijacked planes?


Well good question lets have a look at Flight 93 for example


Following a delay in its scheduled departure time of 8:01 am, Flight 93 reached its cruising altitude of approximately 30,000 feet about 40 minutes into the flight. At about this time the takedown would have been initiated. And at about this time, the aircraft was “hijacked,” according to several cellphone calls. (Note that at this altitude the calls were flat-out impossible.)

CALL C A man claiming to be Mark Bingham called Bingham’s sister-in-law, Cathy Hoglan, who was being visited by Bingham’s mother, Alice. Cathy took the call and handed the phone to Alice with the remark, “Alice, talk to Mark. He’s been hijacked.”

Caller: “Mom? This is Mark Bingham.”

Caller: “I want you to know that I love you. I’m on a flight from Newark to San Francisco and there are three guys who have taken over the plane and they say they have a bomb.”

Alice: “Who are these guys?

Caller: (after a pause) “You believe me, don’t you?

Alice: “Yes, Mark. I believe you. But who are these guys?

(After another pause the line went dead.)



Do you phone your mother using your last name? Noone I know of uses their last name when calling their parents.

Another thing that comes to mind and is very real....( google for yourself.)

Voices can be synthesized in near real time if one has a recording of the voice being recorded. Software that was already well developed before September 11, 2001, was able to produce a very convincing quote from General Colin Powell of the Joint Chiefs: “I am being treated well by my captors.” (Arkin 1999) Moreover, the mimicry is convincing even when played over a high bandwidth device such as a tape recorder.

The third way involves a device called a voice transformer or a voice changer, such devices having been under development for at least a decade. (Ex. Pro 2004) (Spook 2004) (SeeStorm 2004) One speaks into a microphone, the sound pattern is digitized and, in real time the computer within the device produces a signal that is reconstituted as sound, a voice that can be entirely different from your own. Everything you say will be spoken by the synthesized voice and with the same inflections, pauses and emphases. You can transform your voice into that of an old man or a young girl. You can alter the sound of the voice so produced by changing the settings of controls that govern pitch and voice formants, the overtones that make up what might be called the specific “sound” of a particular person’s voice.


Aviation Week (07/20/04) described this new technology in an authoritative report published in July 2004:

"Travelers could be talking on their personal cellphones as early as 2006. Earlier this month [July 2004], American Airlines conducted a trial run on a modified aircraft that permitted cell phone calls." (WP, July 27, 2004)



Oh Oh , so in 2001 it wasn't possible to talk at those altitudes with a cell phone.


So was there some miraculous fluke that all these passengers were able to make clear phone calls.?





The Technology For Cell Phone Transmission



"According to the American Airline / Qualcomm announcement, the technology for cell phone transmission at high altitude will only be available aboard commercial aircraft in 2006. This is an inescapable fact."


In the eyes of public opinion, the cell phone conversations on the Arab hijackers is needed to sustain the illusion that America is under attack.

HERE IS A RESEARCH ON THE PUZZLE OF THE UNTRACEABLE AIRPLANE PASSENGERS



Foxed Out , a documentary by Social Service analysing more TV footage

FOXED OUT part1

FOXED OUT part2

Remember the birds from Foxed Out above? the flock that was flying past the WTC? well take a look at Simon Shack's doc "Some Birds" shown below








For those who would like to see a more indepth study of the "Nose In" "Nose Out" shots as seen briefly above in the other videos. You can do so right here.







Chopped Out







Sources and references to this research : (under completion)


HERE YOU CAN CHECK OUT ALL THE ORIGINAL NEWSCASTS OF 9/11 :


HERE IS A NEAT, STEP-BY-STEP INTRODUCTION TO THE 9/11 TV HOAX


HERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD AND CHECK FOR YOURSELF HIGH-RESOLUTION TV BROADCASTS OF 9/11 :


HERE IS A MOST COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF EYEWITNESSES' REPORTS


HERE IS AN EXCELLENT ALL-ROUND RESEARCH (VIDEOS /PLANNING/ MEDIA PEOPLE INVOLVED) :


HERE IS A POINT-BY-POINT ANALYSIS OF MOST "FLIGHT 175" VIDEOS + WITNESS REPORTS


HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF ALL EXISTING FOOTAGE OF "2ND PLANE HIT"


HERE IS AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF ALL THE COMPUTER SIMULATED FOOTAGE & IMAGES :


HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE NOSE-OUT SHOT



HERE IS AN INSIGHTFUL ARTICLE ABOUT THE ELITE'S
CONTROL OF THE NEWSMEDIA


HERE IS WHY THE FADE-TO-BLACK ON CNN AND FOX HAS NO RELATION TO WTC1 ANTENNA - AND HOW THE MAJOR NETWORKS OVERTOOK THE AIRWAVES :


HERE IS AN EXCELLENT INSIGHT INTO THE "IMPOSSIBLE FRAMERATE" PLANE



HERE YOU HAVE A GOOD GENERAL OVERVIEW OF 9/11'S LOOSE ENDS FALLING INTO PLACE



HERE
& HERE ARE FACTS REGARDING THE 4 "PLANES"



HERE IS A STUDY ON THE 17 SECONDS DISCREPANCY OF REPORTED IMPACT TIMES:



HERE ARE TIDBITS ABOUT SOME EYE-WITNESSES



HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE VIDEO COMPILATION OF EYE-WITNESS REPORTS (WATCH "911 REALITY" PART1-3) :



HERE ARE SOME OFFICIAL TV TRANSCRIPTS:


Transcript 1

Transcript 2

Transcript 3



HERE IS AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE FRENCH FILMMAKERS :


HERE IS AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE OF A THINKING MAN'S LOGICAL PATH TO UNDERSTANDING 9/11

Here IS THE BEST ARTICLE ON WHY THE TRUTH HAS TAKEN SO LONG TO SEEP OUT

HERE IS THE NORWEGIAN 911 PRESS CONFERENCE GROUP'S PLATFORM - AN OUTSTANDING OVERVIEW OF THE QUESTIONS SURROUNDING THE 9/11ATTACK




Full credit for this article, for all the painstaking research, time and effort it took to get to these truths goes to SimonShack who can be found Here & Here I don't actually know who you are, but thankyou, you did what others couldn't :)




An Afterthought


Osama Bin laden was not to blame for the attacks on American Soil, (Mainly because he is a creation of the US Government) The United States Government, however, WAS!.

I shall say this and make it abundantly clear, as free speech allows me to. "I do not in any way , support the "Murdering Jesuit" British or American Government, In my opinion (however unchristian it is at this time) is ... "They can both crumble and burn in hell under their own lies, deceit and Murderous ways"


I do not support any war, murderous actions or tyranny from any country or leader(s) and most of all the Jesuit/Vatican rulers of this world who believe they are untouchable... The day of your downfall is upon you.

-PITP

Read more!

Ace Backer, Ghost Plane.

Ace Baker demonstrates how the Ghostplane video was created.

He uses Apple Motion to present his findings, and states that "any high-end compositing environment could have been used on 9/11"

Ace gives us a demonstration of the compositing techniques used in the CNN "airplane" footage, and the other non-live shots.

Here are a few more demonstrations & Videos.



A demonstration of the technique used in the live 9/11 airplane composites. Article



Theory of Live 9/11 Airplane Composites








Ace concludes that No airplane crashed into either Twin Tower. He says the various videos which depict a plane entering a building, such as Naudet, CNN Ghostplane, Evan Fairbanks, Luc Courchesne, and Spiegel TV, show just that – a plane entering a wall.

They are devoid of the crash physics we would expect from an aluminum aircraft interacting with a steel and concrete structure. The plane does not twist, bend, break, explode or slow down. A certain frame of the CNN video shows no damage to the wall, after the wing of the airplane has passed through.

The composi-traitors would never attempt a live composite showing the plane entering the tower. The timing, positioning and lighting are too critical. It is currently impossible to accomplish that effect in real-time with the precision needed to avoid detection. If the explosion went off even one frame before the plane hit, that would be very difficult to explain away.

However, the live shots do not show a plane entering the tower. In fact, the live shots were cleverly composed in such a way as to make them doable. Only 2 shots showed airplane images live – Chopper 5 and Chopper 7.


Source

Ace Baker's present objective is to offer a theory of how the live 9/11 airplane videos were accomplished, and how one of them went wrong.


He goes on to explain the Concepts and methods were created using a real -time digital effects environment such as "Avid"


To demonstrate, Ace will recreate the technique of the 9/11 composites using Adobe After Effects, because it is software that he owns.

Ace goes on to explain that After Effects is a layer-based compositor that does not operate in real time. However, the principles of compositing are exactly the same, regardless of software. He maintains that any parameters in After Effects which can be set one time, and then operate correctly without need for frame-by-frame adjustment, are parameters which will operate correctly in real-time, given a real-time environment such as Avid."


Please read the full post


Comments in regards to Ace Baker's findings are to be left there not here.


You can leave your opinions here if you wish.

Read more!

Iran Missiles - Photoshopped.

Looks like someone has been playing with the "Clone Tool" in Photoshop.



As an avid and experienced user of photo/video editing software this was a real find. I do have to say it's a really really PATHETIC job. A 6 year old could do better than this.

Noted document debunker Charles Johnson has noticed something peculiar about one of Iran's bits of official propaganda following Wednesday's missile launch.Unless Iranian missile exhaust tends to form remarkably regular patterns, someone's been busying himself with the clone tool.

See LGF for the original hi-res image with some of the curious regions highlighted. Suitablyflip has taken the liberty of animating an overlay based on Johnson's apt pattern matching. As a gif, it suffers some degradation from the resolution of the original, but you get the idea





























This image, part of a framegrab from an Al Alam television broadcast of the launch (apparently taken at approximately the same time from a slightly higher elevation) makes it pretty clear which missile was conjured from borrowed pixels.










Here's a whole series of pics from an Iranian paper and none of them are like the Images we have been shown, however the BBC are now saying "The Iranians Doctored The Photos!

Ask yourself this..... "Why then have the Iranian's posted the ORIGINAL PICTURES on an Iranian website.


Iran claimed they launched nine and then they showed evidence of 3 lots of 3's going up. Simple math and truth. Now why would Iran suddenly want to show 10 going up by doctering one extra. Wouldn't they just Test Fire 10 or 11 or 12 if they wanted to get a point across?!? it's not like they have run out of missiles to fire now is it?

Not to mention the Iranians have already released the video. So why would they doctor an image contridictingthemselves? They have nothing to gain by doing this, but the US Government certainly does.

So we have to ask WHY doctor photographs, is it to make it appear that Iran has a bigger arsenal of nuclear weapons? to make it appear that Iran is a threat to the USA & Israel or an excuse in order to Nuke Iran.

The Times Online reports that:

President George W Bush has told the Israeli government that he may be prepared to approve a future military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations with Tehran break down, according to a senior Pentagon official.

Despite the opposition of his own generals and widespread scepticism that America is ready to risk the military, political and economic consequences of an airborne strike on Iran, the president has given an “amber light” to an Israeli plan to attack Iran’s main nuclear sites with long-range bombing sorties, the official told The Sunday Times.

“Amber means get on with your preparations, stand by for immediate attack and tell us when you’re ready,” the official said.

This quote from the Pentagon contradicts itself...

“It’s really all down to the Israelis,” the Pentagon official added. “This administration will not attack Iran. This has already been decided. But the president is really preoccupied with the nuclear threat against Israel and I know he doesn’t believe that anything but force will deter Iran.”


Any military attack on Iran would be an act of madness.

I would STOP reading the Mainstream Media such as the BBC. NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and if you do... look out for the inconsistencies and LIES, take everything you read in the mainstream media with a pinch of salt.

Original Pictures From An Iranian Website.

Sooo To Conclude....


Original Photo

Photoshopped Version Used In The Western Media.

You have to laugh at the people running this planet. They can't even get ^^^THAT^^^ right.


Afterthought:

Your ignorance is the greatest weapon they have, because once they have your mind, you have given your power over to them. It's time to wake up. - This is some good advice

Read more!